12 autonomous car articles worth reading

You know what's fascinating about autonomous cars? Everything. They raise as many questions as they do answers, and many of those questions drive right to the heart of how we see ourselves and the world around us. For instance, will autonomous cars introduce a new era of independence for the elderly? Will they change the very nature of car ownership? Will they reduce traffic fatalities and help make traffic jams a thing of the past?

Technically, legally, economically, and socially, autonomous cars are a game-changer. I like thinking about them, and I like reading what other people think about them. And just what have I been reading? I thought you'd never ask. Here, in no particular order, are 12 articles that have caught my eye in the last month.

• Driverless technology and the issue of liability: Who’s responsible? (Inside Counsel) — If autonomous cars are to succeed, law makers must take a balanced approach to liability. Because without it, automakers won’t have the incentive to put autonomous cars on the road and consumers won’t incur the risk of driving them.
   
• Can We Put a Price on Autonomous Driving? (ECN) — How about a potential financial benefit of $3 trillion per year?
   
• Big Data Drives The Smart Car (Information Week) — And here you were, thinking the car would drive itself. A look at how “gossiping” cars could make highways both smarter and safer.
   
• California Regulators Consider “Big Brother” Hazards Of Driverless Cars (MintPress News) — A look at why those gossiping cars need to be careful about what they say and who they say it to.
   
• Self-driving cars are coming soon and will revolutionize cities and society (GigaOM) — The title sounds over the top, but the article itself provides a nice summary of Brian Ferren’s “five things that autonomous cars need”.
   
• Can computers drive better than humans? (Fast Company) — Some claim this is pretty easy. But in reality, humans can make highly complex driving decisions almost instantaneously. Will in-car computers be able emulate these decision-making capabilities? If so, how much and how soon?
   
• What If Your Autonomous Car Keeps Routing You Past Krispy Kreme? (The Atlantic) —And what if it automatically drives you past the home of someone who has a restraining order against you? A look at some of some of the legal potholes that autonomous vehicles will have to negotiate.
   
• The Problem With Self-Driving Cars: They Don't Cry (Bloomberg Businessweek) — Can self-driving cars make "selfless" decisions that could, for example, put the driver at risk but prevent the car from slamming into a school bus full of kids?
   
• Government Hitting the Brakes on Driverless Cars (OZY) — To make autonomous cars legal, the rules have to change. Now if we can only figure out who’s in charge of the rules.
   
• Are magnetic roads the answer to autonomous car accuracy? (Electronic Products) — The idea of using magnets or magnetic strips to guide autonomous is at least 60 years old (see this GM video from 1956). But according to Volvo, magnets embedded into the road can help avoid issues associated with GPS and camera technologies.
   
• ITU given keys to autonomous car standards process (The Register) — Because I’m a sucker for the Register’s cheeky editorial style.
   
• Autonomous taxis: Why you may never own a self-driving car (ExtremeTech) — Or why you may end up buying one and renting it out. A look at how autonomous fleets could reduce the number of cars on the road.
   

So there you have it. I don't, of course, agree with every point in every article, but they have all taught me something I didn't know or clarified something I already knew. I hope they do the same for you.

QNX helps drive new autonomous vehicle project

Have I ever mentioned the QNX-in-Education program? Over the decades, it has supported an array of university research projects, in fields ranging from humanoid robotics to autonomous aircraft. Harvard University, for example, has been a program member for more than 20 years, using QNX technology to measure and analyze ozone depletion in the stratosphere.

So, on the one hand, QNX Software Systems supports scientific and engineering research. On the other hand, it's a leader in automotive software. You know what that means: it was only a matter of time before those two passions came together. And in fact, QNX has just announced its role in DEEVA, a new autonomous car project from the Artificial Vision and Intelligent Systems Laboratory (VisLab) of the University of Parma.

A glimpse of DEEVA (Source VisLab).

The folks at VisLab already have several autonomous projects under the belts. Last year, for example, they launched a self-driving car that can negotiate downtown rush-hour traffic and complex situations like traffic circles, traffic lights, and pedestrian crossings. DEEVA incorporates the team's latest insights into autonomous drive and features a rich set of sensors that deliver a complete 3D view of the circumference of the vehicle.

With its 30-year history in safety-critical systems, QNX OS technology offers a natural choice for a project like DEEVA. According to Professor Alberto Broggi, president and CEO of VisLab, "in the design of our vehicle, we selected building blocks offering high reliability with proven safety records; the operating system powering the vital elements of the vehicle is one of those and is why we chose the QNX OS.”

The QNX OS controls several systems in DEEVA, including path and trajectory planning, realtime fusion of laser data and visual data, and the user interface.

You can read the press release here and see photos of DEEVA here

Self-driving cars? We had ‘em back in ‘56

Quick: What involves four-part harmony singing, control towers in the middle of the desert, and a dude smoking a fat stogie? Give up? It's the world of self-driving cars, as envisioned in 1956.

No question, Google’s self-driving car has captured the public imagination. But really, the fascination is nothing new. For instance, at the 1939 World’s Fair, people thronged to see GM’s Futurama exhibit, which depicted a world of cars controlled by radio signals. GM continued to promote its autonomous vision in the 1950s with the Firebird II, a turbine-powered car that could drive itself by following an "electronic control strip" embedded in the road. Here, for example, is a GM-produced video from 1956 in which a musically adept family goes for an autonomous drive:



Fast-forward to today, when it seems that everyone is writing about self-driving cars. Most articles don’t add anything new to the discussion, but their ubiquity suggests that, as a society, we are preparing ourselves for a future in which we give up some degree of control to our vehicles. I find it fascinating that an automaker was at the avant-garde of this process as far back as the 1930s. Talk about looking (way) ahead.

And you know what’s cool? Comparing the vision of the good life captured in the above video with the vision captured in the “Imagined” video that QNX produced 56 years later. In both cases, autonomous drive forms part of the story. And in both cases, an autonomous car helps to bring family together, though in completely different ways. It seems that, no matter how much technology (and our vision of technology) changes, the things closest to our hearts never do:



One more thing. Did you notice how much the sets in the GM video look like something straight out of the Jetson’s, right down to the bubble-domed car? They did to me. Mind you, the video predates the Jetson’s by several years, so if anything, the influence was the other way around.

Frankenstein and the future networked car

So what do Frankenstein and the future networked car have in common, you ask? Simple: both are compelling stories brought to life in Geneva, Switzerland.

In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein the creature is seen climbing Mont-Salève after having fled Geneva during a lightning storm:

“I thought of pursuing the devil; but it would have been in vain, for another flash discovered him to me hanging among the rocks of the nearly perpendicular ascent of Mont-Salève.”

Mont-Salève, overlooking Geneva
Photo: Benoit Kornmann

Of course, the future networked car is a very different type of story, but compelling nonetheless. The laboratory in this story is the ITU Symposium on The Future Networked Car being held within the Geneva Auto Show on March 5 to 6, where many new ideas will be brought to life by convening leaders and technical experts from the automotive and ICT communities.

The event, organized by the International Telecommunications Union (ITU), will consist of high-level dialogues and several technical sessions; these include a session on integrating nomadic devices in cars, where I will discuss how technology standards can help minimize driver distraction. The dialogues will cover road safety and innovation for the future car, and will feature key leaders such as the presidents of Fédération Internationale de l’Automobile (Jean Todt) and Infiniti (Johan de Nysschen). The technical sessions will explore automated driving, connected car use cases, emergency services, and, of course, nomadic device integration. Speakers for these sessions come from a mix of automakers, tier one suppliers, ICT companies, standards development organizations (SDOs), industry groups, and government agencies.

The symposium also includes a session jointly organized by the ITU and UNECE Inland Transport Committee that deals with the human factors and regulatory issues introduced by automated driving. This session is an encouraging sign that the ITU and UNECE will continue the collaboration they started last June (see my previous post, “UN agencies take major step towards international standards for driver distraction”).

Hope to see you in Geneva!

QNX at CES: The media’s take

No, CES isn’t over yet. But the technology concept cars showcased in the QNX booth have already stoked the interest of journalists attending the event — and even of some not attending the event. So here, in no particular order, are examples of what they're saying.

Oh, and I’ve added a couple of stories that aren’t strictly CES-related, but appeared this week. They were too relevant to pass up.

• Engadget, Sean Cooper — Mercedes-Benz CLA45 AMG with QNX CAR for Infotainment hands-on
   
• Canadian Press, David Friend — Ottawa firm masters car sounds
   
• Fast Company, Chuck Tannert — Can Computers Drive Better Than Humans?
   
• Fast Company, Chuck Tannert — 10 Autonomous Driving Companies to Watch
   
• GigaOm, Kevin Fitchard — What do BlackBerry, Qualcomm and Nokia have in common? The connected car
   
• CrackBerry.com, Adam Zeis — In the driver's seat with QNX at CES 2014 (video)
   
• Engadget, Sarah Silbert — With the Snapdragon 602A, Qualcomm looks to improve the connected car
   
• i3, Rob Calem — Driverless Cars on the Rise
   
• The Peggy Smedley Show — Andrew Poliak of QNX at CES (audio interview discussing QNX technology concept cars and future of connected vehicles)
   
• Fox 4 Dallas, Steve Noviello — Consumer Electronics Show (video; jump to the :50 mark)
   
• BerryReview, Ronen Halevy — QNX Shows Off With 13 Partners at CES 
   
• AutoGuide, Sami Haj-Assaad — QNX Shows Tech Filled CLA45 AMG, Kia Soul at CES
   

That's it for now. I aim to post more stories and videos early next week. Stay tuned.